1. Did humanoid visited the Earth?
2. Is there UFO?
1. Did
humanoid visited the Earth?
Let’s assume that the visit of humanoid into the Earth took place. How did it
look like?. Firstly, there should be humanoid vessel that landed on earth. Once,
one vessel landed sooner or later others should land; i.e. not depending on the
first humanoid returned back home or died on his way back, not depending on
that, there should be different visits on our planets autonomously. This thought
should not call for any objection: that is how people discovered new earth:
classical example, time of the Great Geographical discovery. New earth (planet)
was discovered also: first of all the new comers find the way, then follows
research expedition and finally settlers.
How do you think, is there nothing in our planet that can be of interest to
the comers from other planet? Unlikely, negative answer. If it’s so, it means,
they should have created a settlement, a base for findings, research for
collecting what they are interested in.
What can attract them? Our flora and fauna? It can be possible. Our mineral
resources? Also possible. Surrounding planet and asteroid? Off course, they are
very diverse, something might interest them!
Let’s look into the closest to us planet. The earth is rich in useful mineral
resources, if they are not attracted by our biosphere, and our inorganic useful
minerals. Then organic minerals must be of interest. The comers are as well
biological creature, that means completely rear in scale in all cosmos organic
molecule available in the form of oil,, coal and peat. Wood and others would
have been of interest to our unwanted guest!
If humanoid flew to us million years ago, then might have seen these objects
and materials, if they flew not long ago, they would have seen us, people that
must be of interest to them more!
So, first conclusion: In the solar system there is probably something that
can be of interest to humanoid, who discovered it.
Here arose natural question: comers used all what they needed and flew away
or is it not so? Difficult to understand the logic of humanoid creature. It’s
more easy to understand people’s logic and fully fledged to it: such is people’s
logic, we never ourselves came out from anywhere! We, people constantly develop
new environment around us, not scared of ice snow and parching deserts. We
people purchase reason and therefore develop unfavorable places to us. Using the
available to us machine and adaptation. So, why humanoid also with intellect
(they should have it because they flew in) could not do similarly? Off course,
they could therefore under the most unfavorable natural condition to them
doesn’t matter, at least on functional base in the solar system must be!
So, second conclusion: If humanoid whenever visited the solar system, then
today there must be as minimum as one of their functional base in the solar
system. Now very interesting process in the solar system is taking place on our
earth, civilization is developing, taken new forms and this process must be of
interest to the comers. Therefore they must “come closer” to the object under
research, humanoid would not carry on their activity in Neptune completely
neglecting the earth. We also in similar situation will act in the same
way!.
So, third conclusion: If the base of humanoid is located at the bounds of
solar system, then they and their robots must at a given time be located on
earth gathering information about human beings. But there is always mistakes,
also always unforeseen and undefeated phenomenon in nature. That means, with
humanoid there should be catastrophe, ruin and accident. Let their techniques so
developed that ordinary earthly method could not detect it on earth, but the
possibility of accident sooner or later should get to us, the presence of
humanoid on our planet is indisputable to people. They understand not better
than we do, therefore, observing the mask would not be long.
So, fourth conclusion: In the process of their location on Earth, humanoid
should have at least once sustain catastrophe which would give us indisputable
proof of their visit on earth.
Such type of proof should treat: techniques and devices of humanoid,
themselves but not photograph and video film, all possible eye witness! In as
much that there is no INDISPUTABLE proof, it means that there wasn’t comers on
our planet.
The expression “probably” used, because I could not 100% possibility
confirmed and the same time with 90 – 99% I could confirm it.
Humanoid never visited the Earth, and the major proof is their
absent on Earth.
2. Is there UFO?
Unknown Flying Object is the opinion of a particular group of people.
Interplanet (or interstar) vessels of humanoid. Today, there is accumulated mass
of evidences about the flight of UFO, in vision and photographs. There are
radars evidence and eye witnesses, but no one real indisputable accepted fact
about the existence of UFO, the body of humanoid, their cosmic vessels are not
available. Also no robot and devices having clear unearthly origin. Therefore,
the existence of UFO is an open question.
UFO belongs to the class of objects as Loch Ness monster, snow man, bigfoot
and other different phenomenon which there’s no real fact about their
existence. Anybody could raise an objection: “Is photo and video films not an
evidence?” It’s possible in the court but not in science!
The description of new species of animal needs at least one sample of such
animals: If it’s large animal, then there must be as minimum its skin and skull.
So, also with UFO and other bigfoot, for scientific research there must be part
of these objects which presently none.
So, first conclusion: No indisputable fact of the existence of UFO.
But UFO can exist in reality, the proof of their existence not yet
discovered. Also there is no fact of the absence of UFO in real life!. Off
course, if there is no exhibition of general review of flying object, it doesn’t
mean that in nature it doesn’t exist. But from other side (here I start partly
referring to my former article about humanoid) there’s always mistakes and
undefeated process in nature. It means that, there must be catastrophe, ruin and
accident i.e. in relation to UFO. UFO should have broken down, burnt and fell.
As a result we people would have received indisputable evidence about the
existence of unearthly intellect
So, second conclusion (which coincide with the fourth conclusion from my
former article about humanoid): In the process of their presence on earth,
humanoid should have at least once sustain catastrophe which would give us an
indisputable proof of their visit on Earth. And so, as there is no INDISPUTABLE
fact, it means that also no UFO on our planet My expression “probably” used is
because I can’t with 100% possibility confirm, at the same time with 90-99%
assurance confirm that: there isn’t and wasn’t UFO on Earth!
These two conclusions from the two articles beautifully supplement each
other:
1. Humanoid never visited the
Earth.
2. There is no UFO and wasn’t UFO on
Earth.
